GE Reverse Osmosis Water Filters - Here's the Scoop!

Doesn't "GE Reverse Osmosis Water Filters"-soundtypes sold in the U.S.
like a good thing? If GE puts their name on a waterThe GE reverse osmosis water filter is probably
filter, it ought to be good, right?among the better ones of its type. One problem,
First some background:though, with all reverse osmosis systems, is that
You already know there's a problem with our water,they waste water. For each gallon of filtered water
or you wouldn't have been looking for information onproduced, some three to ten gallons is wasted and
water filters. One issue is the increasing contaminationsent on down the drain, depending on the system,
of our water supplies with pharmaceuticals.because of the need to wash the trapped chemicals
Prescription drugs and over-the-counter drugs areand sediment off the membrane.
increasingly being found. We consume, then excreteBecause forcing the raw water through the very fine
(or discard without consuming) these substances, andpores of the membrane used in these systems is a
they wind up in our rivers and ground water.very slow process, reverse osmosis systems require
Since our water treatment plants, for the most partstorage tank, typically 2-5 gallons, which takes up a
at least, weren't designed to filter out theselot of room under the sink.
chemicals, they end up in our tap water. EverythingEven though the membrane has very small holes,
from antibiotics to pain killers like ibuprofen andmost of the pharmaceuticals and other organic
codeine to hormones to sun screen to cancerchemicals such as pesticides and weed killers in our
chemotherapy drugs to anti-depressants-- andwater are smaller than those holes, so they flow
anything else you can think of can be found in ourright on through the membrane. To catch them, a
water.carbon filter is used.
Pharmaceuticals are only part of the problem. StudiesSo why complicate things? Why not just use a
have found that approximately 2100 chemicals can becarbon filtration system in the first place?
found in our water as a result of the 80,000 or soReverse osmosis systems also cost more to operate.
chemicals used by industry, agriculture, and in ourThey typically produce drinking water at a cost of
homes.$.25 per gallon or more. By comparison, the
Many of these chemicals we know to be dangerous.best-selling carbon filtration system, the one I installed
Many of them we don't know about, and wein my home, does it at a little less than $.10 per
especially don't know about the effects of drinkinggallon.
the combinations of chemicals.It should also be noted that any filtration system is
So far, most of the pharmaceuticals have beenmuch better for the environment than buying bottled
found at very low level, perhaps too low to cause awater. Sixty million bottles water bottles a day are
problem... but we don't know for sure what the longmanufactured in the U.S., and most of them end up in
term effects might be, especially on infants andlandfills. That's a lot of plastic in the landfills, and a lot
children. Scientists differ, but many are veryof petroleum used to manufacture the bottles in the
concerned. For example, what if a strain of bacteriafirst place, not to mention the transporting of all
becomes immune to the effect of a particularthose bottles. Huge environmental impact-do your
antibiotic?part to not participate!
OK, so we know there's a problem. How do weFor my money, the carbon filtration, or "Carbon
solve it?Block" filter unit is the best answer to contaminated
The best answer is a home filtration unit, of whichwater. They're the least expensive type to operate,
the GE reverse osmosis water filter is an example.don't waste water, and do a better job of filtering
Reverse osmosis filters are one of the two primaryout the bad stuff.