The Truth About Drinking Water Stations - Is Your Health at Risk?

Drinking water safety is often taken lightly and forfitted which effectively destroy bacteria, viruses and
granted by several Americans. Environmentalists andother germs.
scientists however, realize the growing dangers ofSampling Stations
ground water pollution and other health risks fromThe DEP installed water quality sampling stations as
various sources that contaminate different sourcespart of the water quality monitoring program to
including drinking water stations. Find out how tobetter view and detect the presence of harmful
avoid harmful pesticides, organic chemicals andpathogens and other substances in drinking water.
pathogens.The quality should comply with state and federal
Growing Riskdrinking water regulations by providing a uniform and
Waterborne diseases are very common and haveclean sampling environment that will improve water
affected whole city populations in the past whereinsampling effort efficiency. Public health can greatly be
people presented serious or fatal complications.protected as the stations are installed in different
Microorganisms such as viruses, parasites and bacteriakey areas of a given city. Water quality as well as
can be present in drinking water stations. Cysts likepotentially unsanitary sources can be assessed.
entamoeba histolytica are a form of persistingThe stations are about 4.5 feet from the ground and
microorganisms while cyst carriers can be an infectionare made of heavy cast iron. A 3/4-inch copper tube
source without even having to present symptomsis found inside which feeds water from a nearby
that individuals can detect. Cysts can survive forwater source into the station. A spigot is included in
several weeks or months in a moist environment andthe fixture wherein water samples are taken. Over
are not easily affected by disinfectants.1,000 water samples are taken from hundreds of
Public Exposurelocations each month to be checked for the
About 5% of Americans are affected whilepresence of turbidity, organic and inorganic pollutants,
underdeveloped countries have a higher risk of beingbacteria, chlorine, pH, odor and other properties.
affected by 50%. Some of the major reasons forInstalling hundreds of stations cost several millions of
waterborne outbreaks include poor hygiene anddollars and locations for the drinking water stations
sanitation. It takes at least 2 weeks to examine andwere based on the need to collect representative
get fairly reliable results from water samples towater quality samples in every distribution area. Other
detect viruses. Viruses are more resistant thanfeatures like water pressure zones, accessibility,
bacteria to water treatment procedures and are notproximity to water mains and population density need
as easily detected by bacteriological monitoring whichto be considered as well.
is the conventional process to indicate potable waterSpeaking of Standards
safety.Small amounts of a number of contaminants are
Drinking water stations may harbor enteric virusesgenerally expected. Health risk is not immediate as it
without any sign of bacterial pollution. Waste waterdepends on the presence, type and level of
recycling for domestic use may increase viruscontaminated drinking water. There are standards set
contamination risk. More stringent filtration andby the EPA for about 90 contaminants in drinking
cleansing processes should be incorporated atwater including like sources and various health effects
stations to avoid contaminated drinking water. Therefor the short and long term.
are a number of reliable products that can easily be